Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
integrity [2020/07/15 17:31] mlsmith [2. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)] |
integrity [2020/07/15 17:38] mlsmith [4. Other helpful resources] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
==== 3.1. Past examples of academic integrity violations ==== | ==== 3.1. Past examples of academic integrity violations ==== | ||
- | Students have copied homework solutions verbatim from websites. | + | * Students have copied homework solutions verbatim from websites. |
- | Students have copied homework solutions from current or former students. | + | |
- | Students have collaborated (against the rules) during an online exam. | + | |
- | Students have collaborated (beyond the limits imposed by the rules) on lab assignments. | + | |
==== 3.2. Statistics ==== | ==== 3.2. Statistics ==== | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
===== 4. Other helpful resources ===== | ===== 4. Other helpful resources ===== | ||
- | Going to the Source: A Guide to Academic Integrity and Attribution at Vassar College | + | * // |
- | Three Unique Academic Integrity Challenges in Computer Science, by Jonathan Bailey: | + | * // |
- | 1. Plagiarism in coding | + | |
- | 2. Ownership of works created | + | |
- | 3. Changing Industry Standards | + | |
- | Originality in Coding, by Jonathan Bailey: | + | * // |
- | Coding is an art form / importance of attribution | + | |
- | Plagiarism and Programming: | + | * // |
- | “Part of this is that programming, | + | |
- | Carol Edmondson. 2007. “How to fail a programming assignment”. SIGCSE Bull. 39, 2 (June 2007), 54–56. DOI: 10.1145/ | + | * Carol Edmondson. 2007. // |