Bart --- Didn't get around to this earlier --- Re implementing global pronunciation dictionaries --- it depends on how much work you want to put into it. Things to consider: 1. You could add a new "global" dictionary type into the emacspeak pronunciation module. Warning: might be a performance hit, since if you make it apply everywhere -- *every* speech call will end up walking that dictionary. 2. The *extremely* lazy solution --- if you define pronunciation for "directory" and that directory is "/", it'll effectively become global. 3. Alternative lazy solution: Add code in the speech server layer that reads a user-specific file --- say ~/.emacspeak/global-dictionary -- where that file is a simple text file that includes word/pronunciation pairs one per line. The above may well be adequate -- because where you do want global pronunciations, I suspect you're not going to define complex phrases that require quoting etc. Cons: no user interface, pros: do you need a user interface more than emacs to edit a text file;-) -- -- On 4/18/11, Bart Bunting <email@example.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The use case is that I am not always happy with the way the synthesizer > pronounces specific words. > > When you say that should be done in the speech server, could you > elaborate a little? > > Do you mean that I should implement a mechanism for adding pronunciation > dictionary to the server. This would require an emacs interface as each > user's specific pronunciation preferences are different. > > If this was to be done for a specific server, given that emacspeak would > be adding, removing etc the dictionary rules and presumably doing the > text substitution I don't understand why this should be synthesisor > specific? > > I understand that there may be an arguement to add another type of rule > other than mode, file or directory, that is speech server. This way we > could add specific pronounciation rules to fix idiosyncrasies of a given > speech server and not effect other speech servers. > > However I still make an arguement that there is a case for global > substitution independent of speech server. often it is much easier to > just say I always want this acronym pronounced as bla bla in all modes > rather than addressing it in each specific mode. I very much like the > ability to define mode specific settings but don't understand why a > global option shouldn't also be offered? > > Kind regards > > Bart > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the emacspeak list send mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help".
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:email@example.com No Soliciting!
Emacspeak List Archive | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998
Emacspeak Files | Emacspeak Blog | Search the archive