[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

more on 8-bit characters and ViaVoice




Once and for all this has nothing to do with Viavoice.
You have the source code for emacspeak --look at it for a change!

You need to set variable dtk-octal-chars appropriately --it's a regexp

that emacspeak uses to decide what characters not to send in their raw
uncooked form to the speech server.
RAYNER Peter writes:
 > To recap: characters with the 8th bit set aren't coming out nicely
 > through ViaVoice.   This is a problem when using non-English European
 > languages e.g. the latin-1 alphabet.
 > 
 > I'm sure I'm not going about this in a very intelligent manner but I'm
 > having fun learning a lot about emacs.
 > 
 > A couple of weeks ago I said I thought the problem wasn't in emacs but
 > either ViaVoice or tcl.  It turns out this was unjustified on the
 > evidence I had then but is probably correct anyway.  I had put a
 > write-region call in the body of dtk-interp-queue in the file
 > dtk-interp.el to check whether the strings were being modified by
 > emacspeak code.  They weren't.  However there turned out to be every
 > chance that the encoding system used for the file i/o in my test and
 > the process-send-string was different.  And it was ...  A bit of
 > hacking with some octal numbers confirmed that what was being
 > spoken was the utf-8 encoding of the 8-bit characters so the encoding
 > system was a reasonable place to look, rather than some internal
 > translation within emacs. 
 > On my system the form (process-coding-system (get-process
 > "speaker")) returned (raw-text-unix . iso-latin-1) while the file i.o
 > was raw-text for both input and output.  (note that the second value
 > is for output to the process).  Looked like the solution.  So call
 > set-process-coding-system just before the process-send-string and
 > ... no luck, still the same behaviour.
 > 
 > change tack, was it ViaVoice perhaps?  Get into a shell *outside*
 > emacs and run the outloud tcl script directly.  Not much help there,
 > since the characters with the 8th bit set were being mapped to escape
 > sequences by the keyboard drivers, tcl was never seeing them.
 > However, hacking the tiny cmdlinespeak program which comes with
 > ViaVoice_tts and inserting the problematic 8-bit characters in the
 > arguments of eciAddText produced correct behaviour.  It looks as if we
 > can get things working if we can get the characters to ViaVoice
 > unmodified.  
 > 
 > So back to emacs.  Were the 8-bit characters getting out?   I really
 > wanted to instrument the tcl script to see just what bytes it was
 > receiving but I don't speak tcl.  Instead I wrote a parallel
 > invocation of an external process in the body of dtk-initialize.  The
 > process is a 5-line C program which copies its standard input byte by byte into
 > a file.  A call to process-send-string in dtk-interp-queue and I
 > *hope* we're now seeing exactly the same bytes as the tcl interpretter
 > is seeing.  Here's some output
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > q {ad-handle-definition:  backquote occur-mode-goto-occurrence' got redefined}
 > q {  Press C-h C-e to get an   overview of emacspeak  16.0  I am  completely operational,  and all my circuits are functioning perfectly! }
 > q {Preparing diary aw 3 .}
 > q {Command }
 > q {this}
 > q {is}
 > q {a}
 > q {Preparing diary aw 3 .}
 > q {this}
 > q {this}
 > q {is}
 > q {this }
 > q { is another}
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Note the second last line.  As I look at it now, ViaVoice is saying
 > "q this a circumflex inverted exclamation point" (omitting the
 > punctuation) and a look at the line shows the character octal 241  is
 > really in the file.  A final check with
 > od -t o1 
 > confirms the point.
 > 
 > So where are we now?
 > I think the 8-bit characters are being sent to the speech-server, in
 > fact I think they are making it as far as the standard input.
 > they are not being sent to ViaVoice.  *If* that's right  then the
 > question might be what does tcl do with its input?  I'm not a tcl
 > person at all so am getting some local help with that.
 > I welcome corrections to the logic that's got me here though.
 > cheers
 > Peter
 > 
 > -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
 > emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@cs.vassar.edu" with a
 > subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  raman@cs.cornell.edu
WWW: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/             
AIM: TVRaman
PGP:    http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/raman.asc 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the
emacspeak list send mail to "emacspeak-request@cs.vassar.edu" with a
subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"