Hi Tim, On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 05:20:53PM +1100, Tim Cross wrote: > Possibly the only thing we really need to do is make sure there are no hard > coded location dependencies in the sources and maybe support a way, such as > via environment variables or emacs custom variables, which would make it easy > for package maintainers to put things in their own preferred location. As far > as I'm aware, I think this is largely already the case. This is true for the most part, but not everywhere, and that is what I am trying to address with my patches. look here for example in the espeak server code. I will make comments about the concern and point out a better patch than what I did, but, I don't know enough about tcl myself to do it. set servers [file dirname $argv0] set tclTTS $servers/linux-espeak load $tclTTS/tclespeak.so # this is a hard coded path that forces the shared library to be in # ./linux-espeak/tclespeak.so and fails if it isn't there. # A better approach would be to some how catch this error and try to # load the shared library from somewhere else, which would be definable # by the package maintainer. > Of course the downside of this position is that it may result in fewer distros > having packaged versions of emacspeak. I'm a little divided on whether this is > a real issue or not. Emacspeak is a relatively small and easy to install > application which can run from any installation location. Having to install it > from svn or a tar snapshot is easy and there is an argument that doing so > helps users understand how it all fits together and puts them in a better > position to troubleshoot problems. I also think that the rate at which Raman > enhances the system is far too high for any packaged versions to keep up, so > the packaged versions tend to be a fair bit older than the latest stable > release and a lot older than the current svn version. On the downside, it does > mean that anyone wanting to use emacspeak will need to be prepared to deal > with the installation and while not difficult, there are many who are just put > off by such requirements. Personally, I don't see this as a major issue. We are almost at a point where we can do both. As far as I can tell, this issue is the only one that needs to be fixed to make both work. William
Description: PGP signature
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:firstname.lastname@example.org No Soliciting!
Emacspeak List Archive | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998
Emacspeak Files | Emacspeak Blog | Search the archive