This has been covered before, so check the emacspeak list archives. There has been a bit of work in the org mode community on this. In fact, I believe org mode supports two methods for generating diagrams from text representations. One is graphviz and I can't remember the name of the other, but from memory, it was specifically for UML style diagrams. While this would give you a method to generate UML diagrams, I have no idea how you will access/read such diagrams. Many years ago, I use to tutor a 2nd and 3rd year software engineering course. I think that experience has left a very bad taste in my mouth when it comes to software engineering. On the few projects I've worked on which attempted to apply rigorous software engineering principals, I was less than impressed. It may have benefits on extremely large, mission critical systems, but for the majority of projects I've worked on, it has ended up being a huge time wasting largely bureaucratic process which got in the way of producing working systems more often than it helped. I tend towards the lean and agile methodologies, which tend to rely on refactoring and adapting over time rather than attempting to engineer a big solution to start with. My philosophy with regard to which degree is to focus on the core competencies that you will get in a comp. sci degree and develop additional skills as required. For example, comp. sci is not about learning how to program (IMO). It is about learning the science of computers - what is computable, what isn't, what are the limits, abstraction, complexity, correctness etc. Programming skills develop along the way. For me, developing software is still primarily a problem solving process, not an engineering process. Many of the software engineering concepts and principals can be valuable and I don't want it to sound like I'm dismissing the whole software engineering discipline. However, I don't believe we are anywhere near the point of being able to think of software engineering like civil engineering or even electrical engineering and have degrees which solely focus on that area. More research and experience and developments in computing science may get us there eventually, but for now and for me, it is still a bit too much like the AI stuff of the 70s and 80s. It all sounds really promising and some excellent ideas, but there is still a long way to go until we get there. In the meantime, we can cherry pick some of the good ideas and incorporate them into our existing processes. For example, the use of UML and some basic software engineering principles can help with communication and provide a shared vocabulary which can reduce errors arising from misunderstanding or hidden assumptions etc. After more than 25 years, I still find the concepts and ideas I learnt doing my comp. sci degree very relevant and useful in understanding the changes and developments in the software industry. Ironically, nearly all the software engineering techniques I used to teach back then are now considered outdated. On the other hand, I'm not 100% up with modern software engineering principals. I am familiar with what is being used 'out in the wild', but not what the pinnacle of theory and research is for software engineering, so my ability to evaluate the benefits of such a degree are limited - its just one old coders view. tim On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 12:57 +1000, Daniel Dalton wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Firstly apologies if this is slightly OT - feel free to respond off > list if you think that's better, but I know there are a lot of very > knowledgeable people on here so thought it was a good starting point. > > At University I'm studying computer science. I'm looking to take a > software engineering subject called "Introduction to software > engineering". > > The problem: UML diagrams are heavily used throughout this subject > especially for assessment purposes. Specifically, UML class diagrams and > UML state active and sequence diagrams. We'll need to both read and > create these diagrams. I also believe we may need to work in small > groups with fellow students (who obviously aren't vision > impaired). Apparently the UML is the language of the subject and it's > not really avoidable. So does anyone have any ideas about how to handle > this sort of thing? I'd be interested to hear what other blind software > engineers may do to get around these problems. > > Finally, just a bit of a general sort of question. I'm currently > studying bachelor of computer science, but have considered changing into > bachelor of software engineering. I've been told software engineering is > much more visual - with more of this UML stuff coming up. Has anyone > else taken a modern software engineering degree opposed to computer > science - and how did you find it? > > Thanks for any advice! > > Best regards, > Daniel > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the > emacspeak list send mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org" with a > subject of "unsubscribe" or "help". > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the emacspeak list or change your address on the emacspeak list send mail to "email@example.com" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help".
If you have questions about this archive or had problems using it, please send mail to:firstname.lastname@example.org No Soliciting!
Emacspeak List Archive | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | Pre 1998
Emacspeak Files | Emacspeak Blog | Search the archive