Re: Emacspeak phrase breaks

[Tim Cross <tcross@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree with Jason and Raman - I think opne source is the go as it
gives us all the chance to contribute or fix problems and there is a
higher chance that if someone decides to do a linux distribution with
emacspeak as one of the packages they will be able to include festival
etc. However, although it would be good if the mbrolla team made
sources available, I think that choice is up to them. 

T.X.

Jason White writes:
> I agree with Raman here: it would be preferable to devote effort to an
> open solution, instead of relying on the Mbrola authors to make changes to
> a programme for which they are unwilling to make available the source
> code. If they want to be helpful, the Mbrola authors should make the
> source code available for non-commercial purposes.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>        To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
> "emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"
> 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       To unsubscribe or change your address send mail to
"emacspeak-request@xxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe" or "help"